B. A. Vth Sem, Unit: IX, (Paper -2, Public Administration) Political Science, According to KU- NEP

Unit IX: Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Control Over Administration, Ombudsman ( with special reference to Lokayukta and Lokpal in India) 

By 

Dr. Farzeen Bano

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Control Over Administration

Introduction

Control over administration is essential to ensure accountability, transparency, efficiency, and compliance with the rule of law. In democratic systems, administrative actions are monitored and regulated by three key organs of the state: the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. Each organ exercises distinct yet complementary forms of control, forming a system of checks and balances.  

1. Legislative Control Over Administration

1.1. Meaning 

The legislature, as the law-making body, holds the administration accountable for implementing laws and managing public funds. It ensures that the executive acts in accordance with legislative intent and public interest.  

1.2. Mechanisms of Legislative Control  

1. Law-Making Authority:  

   - The legislature defines the legal framework within which the administration operates.  

   - Delegated legislation allows the executive to create detailed rules under legislative oversight.  

2. Budgetary Control:  

   - Approval of the annual budget ensures financial accountability.  

   - The legislature scrutinizes government expenditure through mechanisms like Appropriation Bills and Finance Bills.  

3. Parliamentary Questions:  

   - Members of Parliament (MPs) can question ministers during sessions to seek clarifications on administrative actions.  

   - Questions can be oral, written, or starred, ensuring detailed discussions.  

4. Debates and Discussions:  

   - Issues of public importance are debated, allowing the legislature to critique administrative performance.  

5. Committee System:  

   - Specialized committees like the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Estimates Committee, and Committee on Public Undertakings oversee administrative and financial actions.  

6. Motions and Resolutions:  

   - Adjournment Motions and No-Confidence Motions are tools to hold the executive accountable.  

7. Auditing and Reporting:  

   - The Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) submits audit reports to the legislature for review.  

1.3. Limitations of Legislative Control  

- Lack of technical expertise among legislators.  

- Dominance of the ruling party often limits effective scrutiny.  

- Complexity of modern administration reduces legislative capacity for in-depth oversight.  

2. Executive Control Over Administration  

2.1. Meaning 

The executive, responsible for implementing laws and policies, exercises control over administrative actions to ensure efficiency, discipline, and compliance with government directives.  

2.2. Mechanisms of Executive Control  

1. Administrative Supervision:  

   - Ministers supervise the functioning of departments under their control.  

   - Senior officers monitor subordinate staff to ensure policy adherence.  

2. Appointments and Transfers:  

   - Recruitment, postings, and transfers of civil servants are tools of administrative control.  

3. Issuance of Directives:  

   - The executive provides guidelines, instructions, and circulars for administrative functioning.  

4. Budgetary Implementation:  

   - The executive ensures funds are allocated and spent as per legislative approval.  

5. Performance Appraisal:  

   - Regular evaluation of officials through confidential reports and performance reviews.  

6. Disciplinary Actions:  

   - The executive can initiate inquiries, impose penalties, or suspend officials for misconduct or inefficiency.  

2.3. Limitations of Executive Control  

- Over-centralization may hinder effective supervision.  

- Political interference can undermine impartiality.  

- Bureaucratic resistance to reforms and innovation.  

3. Judicial Control Over Administration 

3.1. Meaning  

Judicial control involves the review of administrative actions by courts to ensure they are lawful, reasonable, and just. This form of control upholds the principles of natural justice and protects citizens' rights.  

3.2. Mechanisms of Judicial Control  

1. Judicial Review:  

   - Courts examine the constitutionality and legality of administrative actions.  

   - They can declare actions ultra vires (beyond legal authority) and void.  

2. Writ Jurisdiction:  

   - Under Articles 32 and 226 of the Indian Constitution, courts issue writs like:  

     - Habeas Corpus: To ensure personal liberty.  

     - Mandamus: To compel a public official to perform a duty.  

     - Certiorari: To quash unlawful administrative decisions.  

     - Prohibition: To prevent administrative overreach.  

     - Quo Warranto: To challenge the legality of a public officeholder.  

3. Statutory Appeals:  

   - Citizens can challenge administrative decisions through statutory appellate tribunals or directly in courts.  

4. Public Interest Litigation (PIL):  

   - Enables citizens to seek judicial intervention in matters of public interest, ensuring administrative accountability.  

5. Contempt of Court:  

   - Courts can penalize officials for willful disobedience of judicial orders.  

3.3. Limitations of Judicial Control 

- Judicial processes are time-consuming and costly.  

- Courts lack the technical expertise to evaluate certain administrative matters.  

- Excessive judicial interference may lead to a conflict with the executive.  

Conclusion 

Legislative, executive, and judicial controls are complementary mechanisms ensuring that administrative actions align with the principles of accountability, efficiency, and legality. While each organ has its limitations, their combined efforts form a robust framework for regulating administration, safeguarding public interests, and upholding democratic values. Regular reforms are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of these controls in response to evolving administrative challenges.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ombudsman: With Reference to Lokpal and Lokayukta in India  

1. Introduction

The concept of the Ombudsman originated as an institutional mechanism to address public grievances against administrative inefficiency, corruption, and malpractices. In India, the Ombudsman framework is represented by the Lokpal at the central level and the Lokayukta at the state level.  

2. Origin of the Term "Ombudsman"

The term "Ombudsman" originates from the Swedish word meaning “representative” or “agent.” It refers to an independent authority responsible for investigating complaints against government officials or public authorities.  

2.1. Historical Background

- Sweden (1809): The first Ombudsman institution was established in Sweden to oversee the functioning of the executive and ensure accountability.  
- Global Spread: The concept spread to other countries like Finland, Denmark, New Zealand, and the UK.  
- India: Inspired by international models, the Ombudsman system was introduced through the establishment of the Lokpal and Lokayukta.  

3. Ombudsman in India

3.1. Concept in India

The idea of the Ombudsman in India was first proposed in 1963 by the then Law Minister Ashoke Kumar Sen. The term "Lokpal" (central level) and "Lokayukta" (state level) were coined to represent the Indian version of the Ombudsman.  

3.2. Evolution in India

- First Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) Report (1966): Recommended the establishment of Lokpal and Lokayukta to address corruption and ensure accountability in public administration.  
- Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013: Marked the formal institutionalization of the Lokpal at the central level and Lokayukta in states.  

4. Lokpal: Details

4.1. Meaning

The Lokpal is an independent anti-corruption body established to investigate complaints against public servants, including the Prime Minister, ministers, and other officials.  

4.2. Features of the Lokpal

1. Jurisdiction: Covers the Prime Minister (with certain limitations), ministers, MPs, and Group A, B, C, and D officers of the central government.  

2. Composition:  

   - A Chairperson (preferably a retired Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge).  
   - Up to 8 members (50% from judiciary; 50% from SC/ST/OBC/minorities/women).  

3. Appointment:  

   - Made by a selection committee comprising the Prime Minister, Speaker of Lok Sabha, Leader of the Opposition, Chief Justice of India (or a nominee), and an eminent jurist.  

4. Independence:  

   - Lokpal is independent of the government and functions autonomously.  
   - Members cannot be reappointed.  

5. Powers and Functions:  

   - Investigate corruption cases against public officials.  
   - Recommend disciplinary actions or prosecution.  
   - Oversee the implementation of its recommendations.  

6. Limitations:  

   - Excludes actions related to international relations, public order, atomic energy, and space.  

5. Lokayukta: Details 

5.1. Meaning 

Lokayukta functions at the state level to investigate allegations of corruption and maladministration against public servants, including Chief Ministers, ministers, and other state officials.  

5.2. Features of Lokayukta  

1. Jurisdiction: Covers Chief Ministers, ministers, state officials, and local bodies.  

2. Structure:  

   - Varies from state to state.  
   - Some states have a single-member Lokayukta, while others have a multi-member body.  

3. Appointment:  

   - Appointed by the Governor in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court and the Leader of the Opposition.  

4. Powers and Functions:  

   - Investigate corruption and recommend actions against public officials.  
   - Act as a watchdog for the state government.  

5.3. Variability Across States

- Not all states have established Lokayukta.  
- States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, and Kerala have robust Lokayukta systems.  

6. Key Provisions of the Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, 2013 

1. Scope:  

   - Covers all public servants, from the Prime Minister to Group D employees.  
   - Mandates the establishment of Lokayuktas in states.  

2. Time-Bound Investigation:  

   - Complaints to be resolved within a specified timeframe (6 months to 1 year).  

3. Whistleblower Protection:  

   - Provisions to protect individuals reporting corruption.  

4. Asset Disclosure:  

   - Public officials must declare their assets and liabilities.  

5. Accountability:  

   - Lokpal is accountable to Parliament.  

7. Merits of Lokpal and Lokayukta 

1. Transparency and Accountability: Reduces corruption by holding officials accountable.  
2. Independent Functioning: Ensures impartial investigations.  
3. Empowerment of Citizens: Provides a platform for citizens to report grievances.  
4. Strengthens Democracy: Reinforces public trust in governance.  
5. Time-Bound Mechanism: Promotes quick resolution of complaints.  

8. Limitations of Lokpal and Lokayukta 

1. Exclusion of Certain Areas: Jurisdictional limits on matters like public order and international relations.  
2. Implementation Issues: Variability in state-level adoption of Lokayukta.  
3. Overlapping Jurisdictions: Potential conflicts with other anti-corruption agencies like the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) and CVC (Central Vigilance Commission).  
4. Dependence on Government: Requires government support for funds and resources.  
5. Lack of Awareness: Public awareness about the functioning of Lokpal and Lokayukta is low.  

9. Conclusion  

The establishment of the Lokpal and Lokayukta marks a significant step towards combating corruption and ensuring administrative accountability in India. However, to make these institutions more effective, consistent reforms, increased public awareness, and strong political will are necessary. Their success depends on their ability to function independently and without undue interference, upholding the principles of justice, transparency, and integrity.  

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

B. A. 1st Sem, Unit: I, Political Science, Class Notes, According to KU- NEP Syllabus

Tips for Getting Good Marks in Your Exam (Exam अधिक नंबर कैसे प्राप्त करें?)

B. A. 2nd Sem, (Pol-Science), Unit 1 Class Notes (KU-NEP)